September 29th, 2007


29
Sep 07

A Long Neglected Part of Their Education

Manners, that is. This week’s Miss Manners addresses the issue of rude students. An unidentified prof in Florida gave some colorful examples of his or her examples of ill mannered student responses, and this is what Miss Manners had to say:

QUESTION: How can I indicate that a student’s tone is inappropriate without being rude in return?

ANSWER: By saying so.

It is true Miss Manners spends many of her waking hours warning people against criticizing one another’s behavior outright — and yes, thank you, she sees the irony. (She offers instruction only upon request.)

But there are certain people who may properly insist on the etiquette of their domains: judges in courtrooms, parents in their households and teachers in their classrooms and offices. You cannot court-martial offenders, send them to their rooms or roam the campus handing out etiquette violations.

But you can insist on proper respect being maintained toward yourself and, for that matter, toward other students in your class. Think of it as a long-neglected part of their education. The reply to the cheeky remarks you quoted should be that you will discuss the matter when they address you in a civil fashion.

I suppose it is a teacher’s role to teach their students etiquette. Not the fork and knife kind, but simply how one addresses their superiors (yes, I used that word. Very Japanese of me) and behave as civilized adults.


29
Sep 07

How Oedipal Is This?

In romantic comedies, one searches for that true love they felt like they knew all their life. That is the case with Reinaldo Waveqche, an Argentine man who decided to marry an 85 year old woman. Apparently, she was a friend of the family, might have done her share of his diaper changing when he was an infant, and opened her home to him when he was 15 years old and lost his mother. Reinaldo and his former foster mother plan to have more than a “spiritual marriage.”

As bizarre as this arrangement is, they are both adults. No doubt, if they were an American couple, their marriage would be honored, though looked at with askance, because they are a man and a woman.


29
Sep 07

A Last Supper: Folsom Street Fair

Here is an image for your Saturday morning viewing pleasure.

This ad for the Folsom Street Fair apparently angered some ex-gay and fundie activists. No surprise there. However, a blogger on Ex-Gay Watch was also offended.
As for the fundies (and the “no longer gay” closet cases), I wonder what offended them the most:

a. Jesus is black.
b. Jesus is gay.*
c. Jesus is surrounded by gay men, women, leather men, drag queens.
d. All of the above.

The poster on Ex-Gay Watch has a view that many gay conservatives and religious types hold. This writer is concerned about the appropriation of a sacred image, which is obviously Leonardo da Vinci’s The Last Supper. Appropriation of this iconic painting as blasphemy is very superfluous. The real concern of this blogger is that the ad endorses “medically dangerous acts, its inversion of the values of faith, love and self-sacrifice.”

As much as I can appreciate his perspective, to waste energy taking exception to this image is an “inversion of the values of faith, love and self-sacrifice.” Jesus would would not be as concerned about this image as he would with the fundies, the ex-gays, and even the gayly pious. The people depicted in this photo are the unacceptable of modern society and even the mainstream gay community. Anyone familiar with the Gospels knows that Christ reached out to the outcasts and those the righteous and holy rejected. Somewhere along the line, modern Christians, even gay ones, have failed to follow Christ’s example.

*only an inference, nothing else.